Mussio Goodman Law is proud to highlight our recent achievements to our clients and visitors. We hope our recent achievements help you understand the ICBC claim and estate litigation process.
Mussio Goodman Achieves Victory in Supreme Court of Canada The British Columbia Court of Appeal ruled in our client’s favour, overturning the lower court’s decision and prohibiting ICBC from relying on a zipline waiver to deny compensation for injuries sustained in a car accident. ICBC has since sought leave to appeal the decision to the […]
Mussio Goodman has Obtained $340,000 At Trial for Client We are pleased to announce that, after our client declined ICBC’s pre-trial offer to settle for $83,000, we proceeded to trial in the Supreme Court of British Columbia and obtained an award of $340,000 for pain and suffering, wage loss and medical expenses. In July 2009, […]
24 hours Vancouver Recently Reported on the Mussio Goodman Court Success As reported by 24 Hours Vancouver, we are pleased to announce that ICBC has lost for the second time in trying to convince our Court that the website belonging to Wes Mussio’s wife (icbcadvice.com) was infringing on ICBC’s trademark. In 2012, the BC Supreme […]
Mussio Goodman Wins BC Court of Appeal Against ICBC for Trying to Deny Injury Compensation We are pleased to announce that the British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled that ICBC must compensate for the injuries sustained by our client during a bus ride back from their zip line ride. As reported by The Vancouver […]
The Supreme Court has prevented ICBC from Unfairly Examining Our Client As previously discussed, there are two ways ICBC can compel an injured claimant to attend an examination by a doctor of ICBC’s choosing. The first is pursuant to a claim for Part VII or “no-fault” benefits, whereby a claimant is receiving reimbursement for treatment expenses […]
Mussio Goodman Wins Against ICBC in Court As previously discussed, when an injured motorist first informs ICBC of the accident, one of the questions they may be asked is whether they were working at the time of the collision. The reason is, if both drivers involved in the accident were “workers” as defined by the […]
