Supreme Court of Canada Denies ICBC Permission to Appeal Our Client’s VictoryPosted on by Mussio Goodman
ICBC was Denied a Appeal on Our Client’s Court Victory
We are pleased to announce that the Supreme Court of Canada denied ICBC permission to appeal our client’s victories in the Supreme Court of British Columbia and the British Columbia Court of Appeal, a decision that finally compels ICBC to compensate our client for her serious spinal injuries.
As previously announced, the British Columbia Court of Appeal ruled in our client’s favour, overturning the lower court’s decision and prohibiting ICBC from relying on a zipline waiver to deny compensation for injuries sustained in a car accident.
ICBC sought “leave” (in other words, permission) to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa.
ICBC’s argument was that the decision was wrong and has implications across the country.
We argued in response that the Court of Appeal decision was properly decided, and that the issue specifically pertains to British Columbian legislation (the Insurance (Vehicle) Act), and therefore the highest Court in the land need not intervene.Tweet